SynthesisInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026
Comparison of Meta-Analytical Estimates Between Surgical Repair and Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation.
Synthesis in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Transcatheter Therapy in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Recent Clinical Evidence and Emerging Frontiers.Cureus · 2026Review
- Atrial Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Surgical Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAtrial functional mitral regurgitation (MR) lacks well-defined treatment guidelines. Medical therapy alone is insufficient, and either TEER (transcatheter edge-to-edge) or surgery is recommended. Short- and long-term comparative outcomes remain unclear. We aim to address this gap using available data.
methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of studies examining the outcomes of surgery and/or transcatheter edge-to-edge. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were assessed. The incidence rate of late severe MR was the primary outcome. A random model was performed. Leave-one-out, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were conducted.
resultsThirty-two studies (1923 patients); 20 in surgery (1166) vs 12 in TEER (757), were selected. TEER patients were, on average, 10 years older, with twice the rate of New York Heart Association Classification (NYHA) III/IV symptoms and more than double the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk (STS) score. At a weighted mean follow-up of 3.2 years, compared to isolated transcatheter, surgery was associated with decreased incidence of late severe MR (2.53 vs 6.66 events per 100 person-years, P-interaction = .03), late all-cause mortality (3.00 vs 8.84, P-interaction = .024), late heart failure hospitalization (4.44 vs 17.03, P-interaction < .01), and late NYHA III/IV (2.98 vs 22.47, P-interaction < .01). However, significantly better long-term outcomes associated with surgery showed high heterogeneity. There were no differences in early all-cause mortality, early cardiac-specific mortality, late cardiac-specific mortality, postprocedural morbidities, or atrial diameter. On meta-regression, preprocedural heart failure (β = 0.0224, P < .01) and coronary artery disease (β = 0.0294, P < .00001) were linked to increased late severe MR. Older age, hypertension, mitral valve replacement, and associated aortic valve surgery were linked to increased late all-cause mortality.
conclusionsSurgery and isolated transcatheter edge-to-edge repair showed comparable short-term outcomes, with surgery appearing more effective long-term; however, due to study limitations and heterogeneity, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation through prospective studies. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO website: CRD42024504022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.