Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442038›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2025

Ethical Impact Assessment: Theoretical Foundations, Methodology, and Applications.

Philip A E Brey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Philip A E BreyDepartment of Technology, Policy, and Society, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500 AE, Netherlands. p.a.e.brey@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4789-4588

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science 024.004.031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethical impact assessment (EIA) is a structured approach to evaluating the ethical implications of technology and innovation. In recent years, it has gained momentum among policy-makers, research funders, and technology developers seeking more systematic ways to address ethical concerns. EIA was developed to fill key gaps in existing ethics and impact assessment frameworks by offering a method capable of identifying both current and anticipated ethical issues, particularly in relation to emerging technologies, and connecting these insights to real-world governance and decision-making processes. EIA is characterized by several defining features: a modular and systematic methodology, a forward-looking orientation, consideration of the entire technology lifecycle, a dedicated focus on emerging technologies, and intentional integration with technology governance. While EIA has seen growing uptake in practice, it remains underexplored in academic literature. This essay introduces EIA to scholarly audiences with the aim of fostering further research and interdisciplinary dialogue. It outlines the conceptual and methodological foundations of EIA, explores its practical application, charts its historical development and diffusion, situates it in relation to other ethics and impact assessment approaches, and reflects critically on its current limitations and future potential.

Indexed as

Ethical AnalysisTechnologyDecision MakingHumansInventionsStakeholder ParticipationEthical impact assessmentEthical methodologyPolicy applicationsResponsible innovationTechnology governance

Identifiers

PMID41442038
PMCPMC12808269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.