ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Effect of deep learning reconstruction on arm-induced artifacts compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered-backprojection in abdominal CT.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is normally performed with patients raising their arms over abdominal region to prevent arm-induced artifacts that degrade image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) on arm-induced artifacts and image quality in abdominal CT with arms-down positioning, compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) and filtered-backprojection (FBP). A liver nodule phantom with arms from a PBU-60 phantom was scanned in three arms-down positions: alongside the torso, across the abdomen, and crossed over the pelvis. Abdominal CT images of 10 patients in arms-alongside-torso position were also included. Images were reconstructed using DLIRs (L-low, M-medium, and H-high), ASIR-Vs (50% and 100%), and FBP. Phantom images were assessed for artifact strength (location parameter of the Gumbel distribution and standard deviation), signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated patient images for noise, artifacts, sharpness, and overall quality. DLIR-H significantly reduced streak artifacts by 37% in location parameters and by 43% in SD, while improving SNR by 28% and CNR by 29% compared to ASIR-V50%. DLIR-M performed significantly better than ASIR-V50% in all quantitative metrics, except in the arms-alongside-torso position. FBP performed worst, although sharpness was comparable. DLIR-H received the best qualitative scores (low noise and artifacts, minimal blurring, and excellent overall image quality), although ASIR-V100% had lower subjective noise. DLIR outperformed ASIR-V and FBP in arm-induced artifact reduction and image quality and is a preferable reconstruction method for arms-down abdominal CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41442007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.