Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442007›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Effect of deep learning reconstruction on arm-induced artifacts compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered-backprojection in abdominal CT.

Suppakit Wongvit-Olarn, Minchanat Satja, Napisa Bunnag, Kitiwat Khamwan, Picha Shunhavanich

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suppakit Wongvit-OlarnMedical Physics Program, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Minchanat SatjaDivision of Diagnostic radiology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Napisa BunnagDivision of Diagnostic radiology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kitiwat KhamwanMedical Physics Program, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Picha ShunhavanichMedical Physics Program, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. picha.s@chula.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0252-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is normally performed with patients raising their arms over abdominal region to prevent arm-induced artifacts that degrade image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) on arm-induced artifacts and image quality in abdominal CT with arms-down positioning, compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) and filtered-backprojection (FBP). A liver nodule phantom with arms from a PBU-60 phantom was scanned in three arms-down positions: alongside the torso, across the abdomen, and crossed over the pelvis. Abdominal CT images of 10 patients in arms-alongside-torso position were also included. Images were reconstructed using DLIRs (L-low, M-medium, and H-high), ASIR-Vs (50% and 100%), and FBP. Phantom images were assessed for artifact strength (location parameter of the Gumbel distribution and standard deviation), signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated patient images for noise, artifacts, sharpness, and overall quality. DLIR-H significantly reduced streak artifacts by 37% in location parameters and by 43% in SD, while improving SNR by 28% and CNR by 29% compared to ASIR-V50%. DLIR-M performed significantly better than ASIR-V50% in all quantitative metrics, except in the arms-alongside-torso position. FBP performed worst, although sharpness was comparable. DLIR-H received the best qualitative scores (low noise and artifacts, minimal blurring, and excellent overall image quality), although ASIR-V100% had lower subjective noise. DLIR outperformed ASIR-V and FBP in arm-induced artifact reduction and image quality and is a preferable reconstruction method for arms-down abdominal CT.

Indexed as

AbdomenArmArtifactsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansMalePhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioAbdominal computed tomographyArm-induced artifactsDeep learning-based image reconstructionGumbel evaluation method

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.