ArticleOral radiology2026
Mandibular canal cortical assessment for screening low bone mineral density in panoramic radiographs: the cortical index of mandibular canal.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo qualitatively assess the continuity of the mandibular canal cortices at different segments (ramus, angle, and body) on panoramic radiographs and to correlate these findings with bone mineral density (BMD) status determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), using a novel visual index: the Cortical Index of the Mandibular Canal (CIMC) for osteoporosis screening.
methodsPanoramic radiographs and DXA results were retrospectively selected. Women were grouped according to consistent DXA classifications in all evaluated sites. The mandibular canal was segmented into three anatomical regions, and the continuity of its cortices was visually assessed using the CIMC. The Mandibular Cortical Index (MCI) was also applied for comparative evaluation.
resultsNinety postmenopausal women aged 40 years or older were included. The mandibular body showed the strongest correlation between CIMC classification and BMD status. CIMC in the mandibular body also demonstrated higher accuracy (AUC = 0.731) compared to the MCI (AUC = 0.650). Accuracy of both indices improved when combined with body mass index (BMI).
conclusionsThe CIMC applied to the mandibular body is a simple visual index for screening individuals with low BMD. Loss of cortical continuity in this region may indicate systemic bone loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41442002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.