ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
Global research on robot-assisted prostatectomy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From technical validation to functional preservation in robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a bibliometric and thematic evolution analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of the robotic revolution in prostate cancer surgery: evolution, hotspots, and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Global research trends in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a visualized bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With advances in robotic technology, robot-assisted prostatectomy (RAP) has become a key surgical approach for the management of prostate diseases. Compared with conventional open or laparoscopic procedures, RAP provides superior surgical precision, intraoperative stability, and postoperative functional recovery. To comprehensively characterize the global research landscape and trends in RAP, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of English-language publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from its inception to May 2025. Data were analyzed using Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to evaluate publication trends, country and institutional distribution, author collaboration networks, leading journals, and keyword clusters. A total of 2753 publications were included in the analysis. Results showed a significant increase in publications since 2009, with a sharp rise after 2020. The United States led in both publication volume and academic influence, followed by Italy, South Korea, and Germany. Leading institutions included Yonsei University, the University of California, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Major studies were published in core journals such as Journal of Endourology, BJU International, European Urology, The Journal of Urology, and Journal of Robotic Surgery. Keyword analysis indicated that current research mainly focuses on robot-assisted surgery for prostate diseases, particularly robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), covering aspects such as surgical optimization, functional recovery, and biochemical recurrence. Robotic techniques have also expanded to benign prostatic hyperplasia, giving rise to robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). In recent years, research has increasingly focused on refining robotic surgical techniques and evaluating multimodal outcomes. Meanwhile, studies exploring artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged, but their overall representation in the field remains limited. In conclusion, global RAP research has increasingly shifted toward precision and intelligence-driven robotic techniques, with RARP remaining the central focus. Future studies should further advance technical innovation, expand applications to benign prostatic diseases, and prioritize long-term functional and quality-of-life outcomes, providing guidance for future research directions and clinical practice improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41441984What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.