Observational studyLa Radiologia medica2026
Advanced lung segmentation on chest HRCT: comprehensive pipeline for quantification of airways, vessels, and injury patterns.
Observational study in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulmonary and cerebral damage in COVID-19 survivors: is there any association?Annals of medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring pulmonary diseases involving parenchymal, vascular, and airway alterations. However, segmentation faces challenges in distinguishing pulmonary structures due to heterogeneity in image acquisition and pathological manifestations. Unlike existing tools, which usually target a single anatomical structure and rely predominantly on either deep learning or rule-based approaches, our hybrid pipeline pairs U-Net-based AI segmentation with tailored image processing refinements to produce a reliable and simultaneous segmentation of lungs, airways, pulmonary vessels, and parenchymal injury patterns, while enabling quantitative characterization across a spectrum of disease severities and types (inflammatory and infectious).
methodsThis retrospective observational study employed 19 chest CT scans from COVID-19 public datasets for deep learning, 8 annotated scans from the EXACT'09 challenge to validate airway segmentation, and 20 retrospective HRCT scans from COVID-19 and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients for pipeline validation. The pipeline performs preliminary segmentation of lungs, airways, and pathological regions using U-Nets, followed by image processing to refine results, include vasculature, and classify injury patterns in ground-glass opacities, reticulations/consolidations, and air-filled pathological spaces. Three radiologists validated segmentations on a 1-5 scale, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to assess differences across raters, pathologies, and severities.
resultsThe proposed pipeline visually outperformed established tools (LungCTAnalyzer, PTK, TotalSegmentator). Airway's segmentation achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.91 [0.89-0.92] on the EXACT'09 dataset. Radiologists assigned scores of 4 and 5 to segmentation completeness and accuracy, respectively, for both airways and vessels. Parenchymal injury patterns scored 4 for completeness, accuracy, and classification. Ratings were consistently high with no significant differences among raters, diseases, and severity levels.
conclusionThe proposed pipeline introduces a novel, comprehensive, and hybrid approach for simultaneous, multi-structure lung segmentation, demonstrating reliable and potentially generalizable performance across inflammatory and infectious pulmonary diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.