ArticleDiscover mental health2025
Translation, validation and reliability of depression, anxiety, and stress 42 (DASS-42) among Herat University students.
Article in Discover mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Dari-translated Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) in university students in Herat, Afghanistan.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from August to November 2022 with 1000 undergraduate students at Herat University. Participants completed a self-reported Dari-translated DASS-42 questionnaire. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was employed to assess the scale's factor structure, and internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. The test-retest reliability was also examined over a 2-3 week interval.
resultsThe CFA results indicated a good fit for the three-factor model, with RMSEA = 0.04 and CFI = 0.919, confirming the construct validity of the scale. Internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.867, 0.831, and 0.848 for depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively. The test-retest reliability coefficients for depression, anxiety, and stress were 0.956, 0.923, and 0.951, respectively. Additionally, DASS-42 showed significant correlations with other established mental health measures, indicating good convergent validity.
conclusionThe DASS-42 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing depression, anxiety, and stress among university students in Herat, Brazil. This comprehensive validation addresses previous limitations and supports the use of the scale in both clinical and non-clinical settings for early detection and intervention. Future research should explore the scale's applicability in more diverse Afghan populations and incorporate longitudinal designs to validate its predictive validity further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.