ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Selective Artery Clamping Superior to Main Artery Clamping in Preserving Ipsilateral Renal Function after Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy under Prolonged Warm Ischemia.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant Therapy as a Selection Strategy for Curative Resection in High-Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Therapy as a Selection Strategy for Curative Resection in High-Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of CT-derived body composition phenotypes for patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Invited Commentary: Endocrine Therapy-The Next Chapter.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Who Benefits From Adjuvant PD-1 Inhibition? Navigating Time-Dependent Efficacy in Resected HCC.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe renal functional advantages of selective artery clamping (SAC) compared with main artery clamping (MAC) remain inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the impact of SAC versus MAC on ipsilateral renal function after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIS-PN) in patients with bilateral kidneys. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study included 692 patients with bilateral kidneys who underwent ipsilateral clamped MIS-PN using either SAC or MAC, with available imaging, serum creatinine, and split renal function measured at defined pre- and postoperative time points. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:2) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Spectrum score was used to assess the degree of acute ipsilateral renal dysfunction. Recovery from ischemia (Rec
resultsAfter PSM, 365 patients were analyzed (125 SAC/240 MAC). In the limited ischemia cohort (warm ischemia time [WIT] ≤ 30 min) (94 SAC/177 MAC), no significant differences were observed between the SAC and MAC groups in the spectrum score (0.1 vs. 0.1, p = 0.66) or Rec
conclusionsUnder prolonged WIT, SAC afforded superior ipsilateral renal function preservation compared with MAC in patients with bilateral kidneys, which guides experienced surgeons in optimizing MIS-PN strategies for patients with complex renal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41441934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.