Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441931›Full record

ReviewSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2025

AI-powered in silico twins: redefining precision medicine through simulation, personalization, and predictive healthcare.

Sitah Alharthi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sitah AlharthiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Al-Dawadmi Campus, Al-Dawadmi, 11961, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia. s_alHarthi@su.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico twins (ISTs) are emerging as a transformative paradigm in precision medicine, offering dynamic, high-fidelity representations of individual patients through real-time integration of multimodal data. In this work, we define an in silico twin (IST) as a high-fidelity, artificial intelligence(AI)-augmented computational replica of an individual's biological systems that integrates mechanistic modeling (e.g., PBPK, QSP) with patient-specific data streams to simulate, predict, and optimize therapeutic outcomes in real time. By combining AI, physiological and biomechanical modeling, and advanced simulation engines, these systems enable continuous monitoring, predictive diagnostics, and personalized treatment planning. Unlike conventional digital tools, ISTs provide iterative, adaptive simulations that evolve with patient states, fostering a shift from reactive to proactive healthcare. This review explores the technological foundations underpinning ISTs -including machine learning architectures, multi-scale physiological modeling, data integration, and cloud-edge infrastructure- and maps their clinical applications across the patient care continuum. We also distinguish ISTs from digital twins, virtual patients, and traditional computational models, emphasizing their unique contribution to decision support, drug development, and therapeutic optimization. As digital healthcare ecosystems mature, ISTs represent a crucial step toward simulation-driven, individualized medicine. Their continued development offers substantial potential for improving outcomes, accelerating discovery, and reshaping the clinical landscape. Uniquely, this review introduces a practical taxonomy of IST architectures, a verification and validation checklist for model credibility, and a deployment blueprint to guide their clinical translation and real-world adoption.

Indexed as

Digital healthIn silico twinsPersonalized therapyPrecision medicinePredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41441931
PMCPMC12738446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.