Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441919›Full record

ReviewExperimental & applied acarology2025

Comparative dentition in free-living bird nest astigmatan mites.

Clive E Bowman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & applied acarology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Clive E BowmanMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. bowman@maths.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-4981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chelal moveable digit patterns of seventeen free-living astigmatan mite species commonly found in bird nests are decomposed into functional groups using the scoring of observed asperities in order to explain the mites' coexistence in that commensal community. Type 'A' (tearing hook-like) and Type 'B' (nibbling) moveable digit morphotypes are found and the default durophagous 'Bauplan' of the mastication surface is described in great detail. The angles of mastication surface features are important and suggest that asperities are adapted to handle aggregate material. The mites' cutting and crushing moveable digit is asymmetrically designed anterior→posterior. Stochastically the mastication surface of the moveable digits of bird nest astigmatans map between International Roughness Grade Numbers N5 to N7 suitable for fine grinding. Various gripping and bladed adaptations for browsing, scooping and scraping are highlighted. Miniaturisation reduces the opportunity for trophic design space differentiation. Examples of underbite suitable for levering up material are found. Blunt and shallow features (i.e., 'pads') may be suitable for contact with and the gripping of compliant or wetted material. The function of digit tips is discussed. Aleuroglyphus ovatus is a crusher. Chortoglyphus arcuatus is a chewer. Some glycyphagid moveable digits approximate saw designs. Acarus farris is highly variable around a plesiomorphic form. The differentiated surface of Tyrophagus putrescentiae proximal to the condyle adapted for specialised gleaning is confirmed. Some species have a derived form proximally with a 'latch' comprised of an almost right angled zenith tooth and a very strong 'pocketed' gullet just before the end of the mastication surface for 'snapping' material. The detailed pattern of gullets is more nuanced across species than the pattern for teeth. Rhizoglyphus robini showed adaptations to deal with plant material. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus is designed unusually. Nematophagy is discussed. Of the taxa reviewed, it only remains unclear how Tyrophagus palmarum and Tyrophagus similis morphologically avoid direct trophic competition in this habitat.

Indexed as

BirdsDentitionMitesAnimalsNesting BehaviorAcariformesAxesCarpentry sawsCheliceraeClawsCompetitive exclusion principleComposite toolsCrushingCuttingEcomorphologyGlaiveGrindingGryporial hookingNidicolous habitatPiercingScalporial scratchingSocketsStrippingTube cutterWeaponry

Identifiers

PMID41441919
PMCPMC12738647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.