ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
iHalo: a genome-based machine learning model using k-mer for halophiles identification.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Halophiles hold significant value in both scientific research and industrial applications. However, the identification and experimental validation of halophiles are laborious and time-consuming processes. Consequently, the development of an efficient and convenient method for large-scale halophiles identification is importance. Here, we introduce a novel machine learning approach termed iHalo, capable of directly identifying and mining halophiles from genomic data. To ensure data validity, we constructed a rigorously curated dataset comprising 342 halophilic (with salinity > 15%) and 342 non-halophilic genomes (with salinity < 3%). Subsequently, we conducted a 2–10 k-mer composition analysis, revealing distinct oligonucleotide compositions between halophilic and non-halophilic genomes and identifying three core signature sequences characteristic specific to halophiles. To mitigate noise and enhance computational efficiency, we refined the 87,376 k-mers using an Incremental Feature Selection (IFS) method. Consequently, iHalo achieved its highest accuracy at 175 core features, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy (0.9706) and an area under the curve of 0.9622. Using iHalo, we further mined 1,417 novel halophilic genomes from various genomic databases, with 1,369 of these belonging to Halobacteriales. The remainder were primarily classified as Actinopolysporales, Euryarchaeota, and Halanaerobiales. These findings underscore the efficiency and practicality of iHalo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41441917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.