ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
First detection of Babesia spp. in Amblyomma mixtum from Veracruz, Mexico.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne diseases pose a major threat to cattle production in Mexico, with bovine babesiosis caused by Babesia bigemina and Babesia bovis being among the most severe. While the invasive tick Rhipicephalus microplus is the primary vector, increasing infestations by the native Amblyomma mixtum raise concerns about its potential role in pathogen transmission. This study assessed the diversity and minimum infection rate (MIR) of piroplasmids in R. microplus and A. mixtum across 15 municipalities in Veracruz, Mexico. Ticks were collected from hosts and the environment between June 2023 and March 2024. DNA was extracted, and a fragment of the 18S gene was amplified and sequenced. The analysis identified Babesia bigemina, Babesia caballi, and Theileria equi. In A. mixtum, MIRs were 0.21% (1/481) for B. bigemina, 0.62% (3/481) for B. caballi, and 1.04% (5/481) for T. equi. In R. microplus, B. bigemina was detected with a MIR of 0.42% (2/471), while no other piroplasmids were found. These results represent the first detection of Babesia species in A. mixtum in Mexico and the Neotropical region. Although A. mixtum is not considered a traditional vector of Babesia, the findings suggest its potential epidemiological relevance. Nevertheless, detection of pathogen DNA does not confirm vector competence, only exposure to infected hosts. A key limitation was the absence of parallel host sampling, which restricts interpretation of whether DNA reflects active infection or residual blood meals. Further studies integrating host sampling and molecular analyses are needed to clarify the role of A. mixtum in piroplasmid transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41441897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.