Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441845›Full record

ArticleChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

Systematic Comparison of Homogeneous Catalyst Recycling Strategies: Organic Solvent Nanofiltration vs. Liquid-Liquid-Multiphase.

Sven Störtte, Lisa Steinwachs, Rucha S Medhekar, Robinson Novemen, Andreas J Vorholt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sven StörtteMax Planck Institute For Chemical Energy Conversion, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Lisa SteinwachsMax Planck Institute For Chemical Energy Conversion, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Rucha S MedhekarMax Planck Institute For Chemical Energy Conversion, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Robinson NovemenMax Planck Institute For Chemical Energy Conversion, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Andreas J VorholtMax Planck Institute For Chemical Energy Conversion, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-2273

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a systematic comparison of two recycling strategies for molecular catalyst-multiphasic catalyst recycling and organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)-within a unified reaction system. Molecular catalyzed reactions are vital in chemical production, necessitating efficient recycling of costly catalyst metals. To facilitate a fair comparison, a versatile model reaction system was developed that allows for both monophasic and multiphasic configurations while preserving the integrity of the central hydroformylation process, converting 1-hexene and CO/H

Indexed as

comparisonhomogeneous catalysisMultiphaseOrganic Solvent Nanofiltrationrecycling strategies

Identifiers

PMID41441845
PMCPMC12887621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.