ArticleVaccines2025
Evaluation of Polymyxin B as a Novel Vaccine Adjuvant and Its Immunological Comparison with FDA-Approved Adjuvants.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdjuvants enhance the immune response to antigens incorporated in vaccine formulations. Given that the majority of infectious agents enter the body through mucosal surfaces, efficacious vaccines must generate protective immunity at these sites, which serve as the first line of defense. There is a need for mucosal adjuvants; hence, we explored the potential of repurposing existing drugs with established safety profiles in humans. Polymyxins are a class of clinically used antibiotics. They are cationic peptides and mast cell activators, which are a novel class of vaccination adjuvants. The goal was to assess the adjuvant properties of Polymyxin B microparticles in combination with vaccine candidates previously developed in our laboratory, such as microparticulate gonorrhea, influenza, measles, Zika, and canine coronavirus vaccines, and to compare their performance with FDA-licensed adjuvants, such as MF59 and Alum.
methodsPolymyxin microparticles were formulated using a double emulsion method, and the toxicity profile and autophagosome generation of Polymyxin B microparticles were assessed. The immunogenic potential of Polymyxin B in these vaccines was studied using multiple parameters such as nitric oxide release using Griess assay and immune profiling using flow cytometry for markers such as MHC I, MHC II, CD40, and CD80.
resultsPolymyxin B microparticles were found to be non-cytotoxic to dendritic cells up to 500 μg/mL. Polymyxin B promoted autophagosome formation and nitric oxide release, and showed the upregulation of MHC I, MHC II, CD80, and CD40 pathways.
conclusionsThe adjuvant activity of Polymyxin B across various vaccine platforms is significantly comparable to FDA-approved adjuvants, which is a critical requirement for generating T cell responses such as helper T cell and cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.