ArticleToxins2025
Bacterial Microbiota in Soil Amended with Deoxynivalenol-Contaminated Wheat.
Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feed contaminated with the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) can negatively impact livestock health and performance. Bacteria capable of degrading DON present a method of mitigating its harmful effects. This study aimed to identify microbial consortia from soil samples that could degrade DON. Soil from central (Lacombe, LA) and southern (Lethbridge, LE) Alberta were used as microbial inoculant. The soils were mixed with DON-contaminated wheat (18 ppm/kg) on day 0, and each soil type was divided into triplicate pots (180 g) and placed in a controlled environment for 32 d. Control pots of each soil type were included, which contained no DON-contaminated wheat. On days 0, 7, 14, and 32, 1 g subsamples were collected from pots, serially diluted in a limited medium containing DON (10 µg/mL) as the only carbon source, and incubated for 2 weeks (30 °C). DNA was extracted from the pots across time, as well as the subsample consortia grown in DON-amended medium, and was analyzed for bacterial changes after 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The relative abundance of bacterial genera in soil samples after enrichment with DON-contaminated wheat increased across time compared to the baseline day 0 time point. DON-degrading activity (26%) was only detected in LA soil suspension on day 7, and was highest after 14 days of incubation. The most abundant bacteria in the LA DON-degrading consortia belonged to the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.