ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025
The Tolerability of the Dengue Vaccine TAK-003 (Qdenga
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared evidence, different recommendations: a comparative analysis of Qdenga (TAK-003) dengue vaccine guidance for travellers across countries.Journal of travel medicine · 2026Article
- Safety of the Dengue Vaccine TAK-003 and Factors Associated with Adverse Events in Travellers from Non-Endemic Areas: A Real-World Prospective Multicentre Pharmacovigilance Cohort Study in Spain.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Assessment of the healthcare burden of dengue disease in Germany: a retrospective analysis of statutory health insurance data (2014-23).Journal of travel medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe global incidence of dengue has markedly increased over the last decades. Consequently, the risk of infection has increased significantly, resulting in record numbers of imported cases in various European countries and elsewhere in 2024.
methodsIn early 2023, TAK-003, a novel, live attenuated vaccine against dengue, became available in Germany. At the Berlin Centre for Travel & Tropical Medicine, we delivered 56,459 doses during the first 24 months of its availability, from February 2023 to February 2025. To obtain data on the tolerability of the vaccine in travelers, an active follow-up survey was initiated.
resultsIn total, 30,306 (53.7%) vaccinees agreed to being contacted. Of these, 11,827 (39.0%) completed an anonymous questionnaire ≥ 4 weeks after the vaccination. Overall, 6856 (58.0%) were female, and 565 (4.8%) reported having had a prior dengue infection. The average age was 38.3 years (range 4-86 years). An endemic area had been visited by 6309 subjects before answering the questionnaire, and among these, 46 (0.7%) reported a dengue infection while abroad. All cases were mild, and no complications were reported. TAK-003 was applied with other vaccines in 7363 (62.3%) travelers. Local adverse reactions, mostly local pain, were reported by 5263 (47.5%) subjects. Systemic reactions were reported by 4891 subjects (41.4%) and were most frequently fatigue, myalgia, and flu-like symptoms. The majority of adverse events manifested in the second week after vaccination (median 8 days) and were mostly limited to a duration of 1-3 days. A macular exanthema was described by 1844 subjects (15.6%), typically during the second week after the vaccination.
conclusionsSide effects were frequently reported but generally well tolerated. Age groups above 50 years showed a decline in reactogenicity. Co-vaccination was frequent and led to an increase in systemic adverse events. Denominator data of the study population suggest a strong reporting bias towards adverse events. This survey adds evidence of the chronology and characteristics of adverse events associated with TAK-003 and may support decision making when vaccinating dengue-naïve travelers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.