ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025
Evaluating the New TB Antigen-Based Skin Test to Diagnose TB Infection in South Africa.
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the Frontiers of Tuberculosis Prevention: Moving from Targeted Preventive Therapy to Integrated Public Health Strategies.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Tuberculosis Skin Test for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Tuberculosis: Comparison with Tuberculin Skin Test and Interferon-Gamma Release Assays.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) antigen-based skin tests, known as TB-specific skin tests (TBSTs), have been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to test for TB infection (TBI). In light of these new recommendations, we conducted a situational analysis and market assessment to evaluate the utility of testing for TBI in general and of the new TBSTs in South Africa. We found the following barriers to acceptability of testing for TBI overall, regardless of the test: the perceived high prevalence of TBI; prior experiences of poor TB preventive treatment (TPT) uptake, which has led to the removal of TBI tests from the current TPT guidelines; and a poor sensitivity of previous TBI tests in people living with HIV (PLHIV). In addition, further barriers to the new TBSTs in particular were as follows: patient level barriers linked to repeat visits; the need for cold chains; and the need for a strong laboratory system, which reduces the need for point-of-care options. TBI testing was thought to be potentially useful to determine the eligibility for TPT in these use cases: healthcare workers, pregnant women living with HIV and prisoners. One other use case was in the TB diagnoses of children, where it was thought that a positive immunological test (TST/IgRA/TBST) could indicate a TB contact and serve as a 'rule in' test to strengthen the evidence for TB disease as a cause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.