Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441576›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025

Evaluating the New TB Antigen-Based Skin Test to Diagnose TB Infection in South Africa.

Farzana Sathar, Claire du Toit, Violet Chihota, Conor Eastop, Norbert Ndjeka, Katlego Motlhaoleng, Harry Hausler, Matsie Mphahlele, Khilona Radia, Thobani Ntshiqa and 4 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Farzana SatharThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8296-8554
Claire du ToitThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-1296
Violet ChihotaThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1444-9266
Conor EastopFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Norbert NdjekaNational Department of Health, Pretoria 0187, South Africa.
Katlego MotlhaolengUS Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-1038
Harry HauslerTB HIV Care, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5896-4089
Matsie MphahleleThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.
Khilona RadiaAntrum Biotech, Cape Town 7925, South Africa.
Thobani NtshiqaThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-3192
Mark HatherillSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 6850, South Africa.
Juli SwitalaThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0000-8946-8475
Salome CharalambousThe Aurum Institute, 33 Wrench Road, Johannesburg 1613, South Africa.
Kavindhran VelenFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics FIND-TB-SKT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) antigen-based skin tests, known as TB-specific skin tests (TBSTs), have been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to test for TB infection (TBI). In light of these new recommendations, we conducted a situational analysis and market assessment to evaluate the utility of testing for TBI in general and of the new TBSTs in South Africa. We found the following barriers to acceptability of testing for TBI overall, regardless of the test: the perceived high prevalence of TBI; prior experiences of poor TB preventive treatment (TPT) uptake, which has led to the removal of TBI tests from the current TPT guidelines; and a poor sensitivity of previous TBI tests in people living with HIV (PLHIV). In addition, further barriers to the new TBSTs in particular were as follows: patient level barriers linked to repeat visits; the need for cold chains; and the need for a strong laboratory system, which reduces the need for point-of-care options. TBI testing was thought to be potentially useful to determine the eligibility for TPT in these use cases: healthcare workers, pregnant women living with HIV and prisoners. One other use case was in the TB diagnoses of children, where it was thought that a positive immunological test (TST/IgRA/TBST) could indicate a TB contact and serve as a 'rule in' test to strengthen the evidence for TB disease as a cause.

Indexed as

programmatic implementationtuberculosis preventive treatmentuse cases

Identifiers

PMID41441576
PMCPMC12737664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.