ReviewSports (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mapping 50 Years of Sport Psychology-Performance Meta-Analyses: A PRISMA-ScR Scoping Review.
Review in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Meta-Analysis of the CSAI-2 and CSAI-2R with Objective Sport Performance from 1985-2026.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Situational and Dispositional Achievement Goals' Relationships with Measures of State and Trait Sport Confidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sport psychology has generated an expansive body of literature on how psychological factors influence athletic performance, yet no review has systematically mapped this body of research. Guided by the PRISMA-ScR framework, this study charted published meta-analyses that investigated links between psychological constructs and sport performance. After conducting comprehensive searches, we identified 137 relevant papers, of which 73 met our inclusion criteria for athlete samples and performance outcomes. The included meta-analyses, published between 1988 and 2025, represented authors from at least 30 countries and covered more than 40 different constructs. Mental practice, confidence, achievement goals, anxiety, cohesion, mindfulness, and neurofeedback were the most frequently studied topics. Publication activity has accelerated rapidly since 2020, reflecting the maturation and diversification of evidence synthesis in sport psychology. Rather than aggregating effect sizes, this review maps methodological trends, recurring themes, and areas of limited coverage. The resulting catalog highlights where the evidence base is strongest, identifies emerging opportunities, and provides a foundation for future quantitative reviews to progress consensus development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.