ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Quantitative Ultrasound Grayscale Analysis and Size of Benign and Malignant Solid Thyroid Nodules.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound is the primary imaging modality for evaluating thyroid nodules, with echogenicity and nodule size serving as parameters for malignancy risk stratification. Though the TI-RADS classification system is standardized, interpretation varies among observers due to subjectivity, and can affect diagnostic consistency. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and interobserver agreement of quantitative ultrasound gray-scale analysis and nodule area in differentiating benign from malignant solid thyroid nodules.
methodsThis retrospective study reviewed 600 patients who underwent thyroid ultrasound at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2023 and 2024. Of these 600, 107 adult patients with 116 solid thyroid nodules (96 benign and 20 malignant) who subsequently underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration were included in the final analysis. From B-mode ultrasound images, the grayscale median (GSM) values of each nodule and adjacent normal thyroid tissue were measured using Adobe Photoshop. The GSM ratio (GSMr) was calculated by dividing nodule GSM by normal tissue GSM. Nodule size, taken as cross-sectional area, was assessed using ImageJ software version 1.53. The Mann-Whitney
resultsMalignant nodules had significantly lower GSMr compared to benign nodules (malignant: median 0.76, IQR 0.27; benign: median 0.88, IQR 0.55,
conclusionsQuantitative ultrasound assessment of grayscale echogenicity and nodule area provides valuable diagnostic information for differentiating benign from malignant solid thyroid nodules. These objective measures may enhance diagnostic confidence and support more precise clinical decision-making in thyroid nodule evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.