ReviewNeurology international2025
Early Versus Late Anticoagulation for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 17,380 Patients.
Review in Neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe optimal timing for initiating oral anticoagulants (OACs) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain due to potential risks of recurrent stroke and bleeding. This meta-analysis compares early versus late OAC initiation for recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality.
methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective, and retrospective observational studies. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed to assess outcomes by study design. Heterogeneity was quantified using I
resultsA total of 17 studies were included. Early OAC initiation was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent ischemic stroke compared to late initiation (OR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.58, 0.95],
conclusionsEarly initiation of OACs post-AIS in AF patients significantly reduces ischemic stroke recurrence without increasing risks of ICH, major bleeding, systemic embolism, or mortality. These findings support early anticoagulation strategies for selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.