ArticleNeuroSci2025
The Weight of Eloquence in Motor Area Glioblastoma: Oncologic Outcome After nTMS-Guided Surgical Resection.
Article in NeuroSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastomas (GBMs) in eloquent areas, particularly within the motor system, represent a significant surgical challenge due to the risk of postoperative neurological deficits. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a structured preoperative protocol, including nTMS-guided motor mapping, to optimize surgical outcomes and minimize neurological deficits, with a particular focus on the timing of adjuvant oncological therapy initiation.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 GBM patients, divided into two groups: 11 with motor area lesions (group A) and 33 with non-eloquent lesions (group B). All patients underwent a standardized preoperative protocol. Surgical outcomes (EORs), neurological function (MRC score and KPS index), time to oncological therapy initiation and survival (OS and PFS) were compared between groups.
resultsBoth groups achieved high rates of GTR without significant differences in EOR (72.7% group A vs. 78.8% group B). Although group A exhibited a higher incidence of postoperative motor deficits, motor function at three-month follow-up was similar between groups. Time to initiation of oncological therapy did not differ between groups (40.6 days group A vs. 41.9 days group B,
conclusionsA structured preoperative protocol incorporating nTMS motor mapping allows for safe and aggressive resection of motor-area GBMs. This approach effectively mitigates the risk of delays in initiating adjuvant oncological therapy, optimizing the patient prognosis. Further studies are needed to explore the long-term benefits of this protocol in both functional and oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.