Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441082›Full record

ArticleMembranes2025

Effects of Metal Foam Insertion on the Performance of a Vacuum Membrane Distillation Unit.

Nizar Loussif, Jamel Orfi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nizar LoussifLaboratory for the Study of Thermal and Energy Systems LESTE-LR99ES31, ENIM, University of Monastir, Monastir 5019, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-5795
Jamel OrfiMechanical Engineering Department, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8537-5810

Funding

King Saud University Ongoing Research Funding Program (ORF-XXXX-XX)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the use of aluminum foam to enhance pure water production using a Vacuum Membrane Distillation (VMD) desalination unit. Numerical simulations were conducted for a conventional VMD and three VMD configurations with different metal foam thickness-to-channel-width ratios of h/b = (0.5, 0.75, 1). The effects of operational parameters on different VMD setups were presented and discussed. Additionally, the effects of flow rates on temperature polarization, average Nusselt number, and pressure drop were presented and discussed. The performance evaluation criterion (PEC), an indicator of the system's global performance encompassing the heat transfer enhancement and the related pressure loss, has also been used and analyzed. Outcomes demonstrate improvements in water production with the increase in inlet velocity and temperature, while applied vacuum pressure and inlet concentration increments showed opposite behavior for all studied VMD setups. Permeate flux and temperature polarization were enhanced with metal foam insertion, and the case h = b presents the highest permeate flux and pressure drop. PEC demonstrates values superior to unity for all studied cases, with higher values for lower flow rates. Fully filled metal foam insertion is recommended for lower flow rates, while partially filled metal foam (h = 0.5b) is suggested for higher ones.

Indexed as

desalinationheat and mass transfermetal foamvacuum membrane distillation

Identifiers

PMID41441082
PMCPMC12734810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.