ArticleMembranes2025
Optimized Ultrafiltration Membrane Based on Acrylic Fiber Waste for Organic Compounds Removal from Wastewater.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study reports the development of an optimized tight ultrafiltration (UF) membrane prepared from recycled acrylic fiber (polyacrylonitrile, PAN) waste for the efficient removal of organic pollutants from water. Membranes were fabricated using different concentrations of acrylic fiber waste to examine the influence of polymer content on their morphology and performance. The prepared membranes were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), porosity measurements, contact angle analysis, and mechanical strength testing to evaluate their structural and physicochemical properties. Among the tested formulations, membrane M4, containing 22.5 wt.% acrylic fiber waste, shows the most balanced performance, high mechanical integrity, and good surface hydrophilicity, with a contact angle of about 52° and porosity of 27%. The optimized M4 membrane demonstrates excellent pure water flux of 65 LMH. M4 achieves a flux recovery ratio (FRR) above 80%. Its performance was further evaluated for the removal of humic acid (HA) and paracetamol as a model of organic contaminants. The results also demonstrate strong chemical stability under acidic and basic conditions, highlighting the potential of recycled acrylic fiber waste as a sustainable polymer source for high-performance tight UF membranes. This approach offers an environmentally friendly and cost-effective solution for water purification and pharmaceutical contaminant removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.