ArticleMetabolites2025
Comparative Phytochemical Analysis of Five Species of the Genus
Article in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe genus
objectivesThis study aimed to conduct the first comparative phytochemical analysis of five
methodsPhytochemical profiling was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify volatile and semi-volatile metabolites in the studied species.
resultsGC-MS analysis revealed a predominance of terpenes in all species, along with significant contributions from fatty acids, esters, and other oxygen-containing compounds. The taxa were characterized by a rich pool of isoprenoids, including terpenes, sterols, tocopherols, and squalene, as well as lipid components of cuticular coatings such as fatty acids and long-chain alcohols. Isoprenoids dominated particularly in
conclusionsThe results obtained for the first time demonstrate distinct chemotaxonomic and functional features of relict
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.