Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440923›Full record

ReviewJournal of developmental biology2025

How Cytoskeletal Disorders Contribute to Errors in the Chromosomal Segregation of Oocytes and Cleavage Stage Embryos.

Stefka Delimitreva, Irina Chakarova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefka DelimitrevaDepartment of Biology, Medical University of Sofia, 2 Zdrave Street, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-4654
Irina ChakarovaDepartment of Biology, Medical University of Sofia, 2 Zdrave Street, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-8008-9812

Funding

This study was supported by the Medical University of Sofia grants ref. 25/2016, 65/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observations of the processes of oogenesis, fertilization, and the earliest embryonic development have given us the opportunity to estimate the importance of chromosomal distribution errors for the success of mammalian reproduction. It is now known that in the large volume of oocytes, zygotes and the first embryonic cells, the rearrangement of chromatin is associated with a complex rearrangement of cytoskeletal structures, which creates specific problems. This review discusses two main issues critical to the success of early embryos: Why oocyte meiosis is too frequently wrong in chromosomal segregation? Why the first zygotic mitoses are too frequently wrong in chromosomal segregation? We concluded the following: (1) The main cytoskeletal defects that disturb oocyte meiosis are a problematic connection between cytoskeleton and nucleoskeleton, unsuccessful movement of the spindle to the oocyte periphery, unstable anchoring of the spindle to oolemma, and deviations in meiotic spindle morphology; (2) The main cytoskeletal defects that disturb pronuclear unification are nonfunctional male centriole, unsuccessful forming of microtubule aster around the sperm centrosome, problematic movement of the two pronuclei towards each other and inappropriate contacts between centrosomes, microtubules and nuclear pore complexes; (3) Cytoskeletal defects that disturb zygote mitosis are unsuccessful forming of bipolar mitotic spindle, non-synchronized congression of maternal and paternal chromosomes, and unsuccessful attachment of kinetochores to microtubules.

Indexed as

aneuploid embryofertilizationmeiosisoocytepreimplantation embryo

Identifiers

PMID41440923
PMCPMC12733754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.