ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Development and Validation of an Acute Large Animal Model for Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnimal models are essential for translating diagnostic and therapeutic strategies into clinical practice and offer valuable insights into the pathophysiology of diseases such as aortic dissection. This study presents a novel acute in vivo large animal model of Stanford type A aortic dissection, combining open surgical access with endovascular techniques to leverage the advantages of both. The model aims to reproducibly simulate acute dissections in swine, providing a standardized platform for evaluating diagnostics, disease mechanisms, and treatment strategies.
methodsSix pigs underwent a standardized protocol to induce aortic dissection. Arterial pressure was monitored via femoral and carotid catheterization. A conventional sternotomy was performed, followed by tangential cross-clamping of the ascending aorta and a controlled incision proximal to the brachiocephalic trunk. The intima and the media were separated using a guidewire and catheter-based technique to create a false lumen. A re-entry tear was also established to allow for controlled intraluminal access. Animals were monitored for 12 h post-intervention, with serial blood sampling. At the end of the experiment, the animals were euthanized and the aortas harvested for macroscopic and histological analysis.
resultsIn all 6 animals, the placement of arterial catheters in femoral and carotid arteries, as well as the sternotomy, was established without any complications. The dissection model was successfully created in 5 out of 6 animals by clinical signs such as adventitial hematoma, macroscopic wall separation and/or decreased femoral blood pressure. One animal experienced complete aortic perforation. Five animals completed the full observation period of 12 h.
conclusionA standardized, reproducible, and robust large animal model of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection using a hybrid approach was developed. This model closely simulates the clinical and pathological features of human aortic dissection, making it a valuable tool for preclinical research in diagnostics, pathophysiology, and treatment development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.