ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Angioplasty in Patients with Central Venous Occlusion Prior to Device Lead Implantation.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous stenosis or occlusion often hinders transvenous cardiac device lead implantation, especially in patients with prior devices or long-term venous access. Surgical alternatives and femoral routes carry higher risk. We retrospectively evaluated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in 11 patients with significant venous obstruction. Recanalization was successful in 10/11 cases (91%). Eight leads were implanted immediately, two delayed, with one re-occlusion linked to delay. No peri-procedural complications occurred. Technical success was defined as successful lead implantation through the recanalized vein; clinical success was defined as absence of subclavian venous syndrome (no arm pain or swelling) during follow-up. During follow-up, no symptomatic re-occlusion was observed. PTA appears safe and effective, with same-session lead implantation minimizing re-occlusion risk, offering a valuable alternative when conventional venous access is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.