ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025
A Nationwide Survey Investigating the Current Status of Genetic Counseling in Newborn Screening in Japan.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following Newborn Screening (NBS), parents receiving positive results experience various psychosocial effects upon learning their child's genetic information or unexpected findings. These factors warrant careful consideration. The Japanese Medical Association's Guidelines for Genetic Testing and Diagnosis in Medical Care highlight the importance of genetic counseling (GC) in NBS; however, its current implementation status remains unclear. This study aimed to determine current approaches to GC following positive NBS results in Japan. A questionnaire was conducted with pediatric metabolic specialists responsible for treating individuals who screen positive through NBS results to evaluate GC implementation and their views on its provision. GC was provided at most referral centers for NBS (although not routinely at approximately half of the facilities). In over 70% of cases, GC was performed by a metabolic specialist, regardless of clinical geneticist certification. Furthermore, some metabolic specialists may be reluctant to provide GC due to limited understanding or time constraints. Raising awareness that all parents are eligible for GC, regardless of their child's diagnosis or health status, is essential. In addition, a GC system incorporating multidisciplinary and multidepartmental collaboration is important for the multifaceted support of patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.