ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Global and Local Deviance Effects in the Processing of Temporal Patterns.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual and sensorimotor events are often experienced as temporal patterns, that is, identified as sequences based on their temporal features. While current timing models propose separate mechanisms supporting the processing of single intervals and temporal patterns, they leave partially unclear whether the latter entails the processing of both individual intervals and the overall structure of a pattern, or only one of these features. Here, we narrowed this question down by investigating how violations of regularity within the individual intervals of a temporal sequence (i.e., local violations) and in its overall structure (i.e., global violations) differentially affect its reproduction. We tested these violation effects in three experiments in which the sequences were experienced either in the visual or auditory domain and had either simple or complex structures. Results showed that the precision in reproducing simple visual and auditory patterns was primarily affected by local violations, whereas global violations mostly impacted the reproduction of visual patterns with complex structures. These detrimental effects were partially explained by rescaling and bias effects in the reproduced patterns. Overall, our findings indicate that the processing and reproduction of temporal patterns differentially weigh individual intervals and global structure, depending on sensory modality and, for visual patterns, on structural complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.