ArticleJournal of xenobiotics2025
In Vitro Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Evaluation of Nitazenes, a Potent Class of New Synthetic Opioids.
Article in Journal of xenobiotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotoxic Potential of Metodesnitazene and Etodesnitazene: Insights with and Without S9 Metabolic Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Acute toxicity and sex-dependent lethality of isotonitazene in fischer 344 rats.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the expansion of the illicit market for Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) has resulted in the emergence of numerous synthetic recreational drugs specifically designed to evade legal control and analytical detection. Among these, nitazenes represent one of the most potent classes of new synthetic opioids, although information regarding their toxicological properties remains limited. The present study aimed to assess the genotoxic potential of four nitazenes: clonitazene, etonitazene, isotonitazene and metonitazene in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells using a flow cytometric version of the In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test, following OECD Guideline No. 487. Cells were exposed to concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 100 μM, and cytotoxicity, cytostasis, and apoptosis were evaluated to identify appropriate doses for micronucleus frequency assessment. Vinblastine, a well-established mutagen, was included as positive control. Our findings demonstrated that clonitazene and isotonitazene exhibit mutagenic potential, suggesting an increased long-term risk of developing chronic degenerative diseases. Furthermore, the results revealed that structurally related molecules can induce markedly different cellular effects, underscoring the importance of compound-specific toxicological evaluations to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the risks associated with their illicit use-risks often presumed to involve only addiction or acute toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.