ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Influence of Sandblasting Particle Size on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Milled and 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns or Materials After Artificial Aging.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis in vitro study ascertained the impact of three distinct alumina particle sizes on the shear bond strength (SBS) between two distinct provisional crowns (milled and 3D-printed) and stainless-steel orthodontic brackets following artificial aging. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighty specimens [disc 10 mm diameter/15 mm height] were fabricated with two provisional crown materials, milled (CopraTemp) [group (GP) M] and three-dimensionally printed (Asiga DentaTooth) (GP P), and divided into eight subgroups based on alumina oxide (sandblasting) particle size surface treatments of 25 μm [P25, M25], 50 μm [P50, M50], and 100 μm [P100, M100], with no surface treatment specimens serving as control [PC, MC]. After thermocycling (2200 cycles), the SBS and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) were calculated. Statistical tests included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Kruskal-Wallis), followed by post hoc tests [Tukey HSD, Dunn's], with the probability '
resultsWithout surface treatment, the 3D-printed provisional crown had the lowest SBS [median (IQR); 12.8 (2.74)]. The highest SBS was found in both milled and 3D-printed PMs with 50-micron particle sizes [Milled = 23.10 (2.3); Printed = 20.72 (2.31)], followed by 100-micron [Milled = 20 (2.36); Printed = 17.99 (3.45)] and 25-micron [Milled = 16.13 (2.71); Printed = 15.08 (1.55)]. The majority of cohesive failures were seen in the milled subgroups, while all subgroups of 3D-printed provisional material had adhesive bond failures.
conclusionsSandblasting, irrespective of particle size, enhances SBS in both milled and 3D-printed provisional restorations; however, 50-micron alumina particles are recommended since they enhance SBS substantially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.