ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Regenerative Cartilage Constructs with Directional Ionically Derived Stiffness Gradients.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Mathematical Platform for the Control and Manipulation of Magnetized Living Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design and Fabrication of Biomimetic Gradient Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Evolution from Single-Gradient to Multi-Gradient.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue engineering approaches for cartilage tissue regeneration are expanding to include the complex features of the tissue, such as the biological and mechanical gradients. Many of these approaches are, however, based on the use of multiple biomaterials or concentrations, and crosslinking methods that make it difficult to integrate and control the properties of the resulting scaffolds. In this study, a 3D bioprinted scaffold with a stiffness gradient was fabricated by using a single biomaterial type and concentration combined with a directional ionic crosslinking method. The scaffolds revealed a gradient in stiffness from 39.8 ± 6.6 kPa at the top to 60.6 ± 10.9 kPa at the bottom of the scaffolds. Live/dead analysis of human chondrocytes embedded in the scaffolds showed no negative effects of the stiffness gradient on cell viability over 28 days. The induced stiffness gradient led to a gradient in cell density and sulfated glycosaminoglycan deposition in the bioprinted tissue constructs with enhanced values in the softer top region of the scaffolds as compared to the stiffer bottom part. This study showed a novel method to generate scaffolds with stiffness gradients from a single biomaterial and indicates that such scaffolds could be used to spatially regulate the behavior of chondrocytes and the associated deposition of the cartilage matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.