Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440605›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Mechanical Performance of Nonabsorbable Monofilament Suture Materials Tied with Different Suturing Techniques Under Various Knot Configurations: An In Vitro Study.

Nuri Mert Taysi, Aysegul Erten Taysi, Pinar Ercal, Soner Sismanoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nuri Mert TaysiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5595-9302
Aysegul Erten TaysiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, 34295 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9156-9109
Pinar ErcalDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Health and Technology University, 34445 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0763-3930
Soner SismanogluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1272-5581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared widely used nonabsorbable and monofilament suture materials tied with three different configurations and two different suture techniques. Three suture materials (polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and nylon) were tied with either Laurell-Gottlow or the horizontal mattress suturing techniques using three different knot configurations: A (2 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1), B (2 × 1 = 1 = 1 = 1), and C (1 × 2 = 1 = 1 = 1) on an experimental platform manufactured using a three-dimensional printer. Specimens underwent microtensile testing to determine maximum load failure and elongation rates at baseline and after 7 days of artificial saliva immersion. The Laurell-Gottlow yielded significantly lower elongation rates and higher failure load than the horizontal mattress suturing technique using nylon and polypropylene sutures at both time points (

Indexed as

artificial salivamaterial testingmonofilament suture materialsnonabsorbable suture materialssuturessuture techniqueswound closure techniques

Identifiers

PMID41440605
PMCPMC12733649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.