ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Research on Augmentation of Wood Microscopic Image Dataset Based on Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopic wood images are vital in wood analysis and classification research. However, the high cost of acquiring microscopic images and the limitations of experimental conditions have led to a severe problem of insufficient sample data, which significantly restricts the training performance and generalization ability of deep learning models. This study first used basic image processing techniques to perform preliminary augmentation of the original dataset. The augmented data were then input into five GAN models, BGAN, DCGAN, WGAN-GP, LSGAN, and StyleGAN2, for training. The quality and model performance of the generated images were assessed by analyzing the degree of fidelity of cellular structure (e.g., earlywood, latewood, and wood rays), image clarity, and diversity of the images for each model-generated image, as well as by using KID, IS, and SSIM. The results showed that images generated by BGAN and WGAN-GP exhibited high quality, with lower KID values and higher IS values, and the generated images were visually close to real images. In contrast, the DCGAN, LSGAN, and StyleGAN2 models experienced mode collapse during training, resulting in lower image clarity and diversity compared to the other models. Through a comparative analysis of different GAN models, this study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of Generative Adversarial Networks in the domain of small-sample image data augmentation, providing an important reference for further research in the field of wood identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.