ArticleJournal of imaging2025
UAV-TIRVis: A Benchmark Dataset for Thermal-Visible Image Registration from Aerial Platforms.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Registering UAV-based thermal and visible images is a challenging task due to differences in appearance across spectra and the lack of public benchmarks. To address this issue, we introduce UAV-TIRVis, a dataset consisting of 80 accurately and manually registered UAV-based thermal (640 × 512) and visible (4K) image pairs, captured across diverse environments. We benchmark our dataset using well-known registration methods, including feature-based (ORB, SURF, SIFT, KAZE), correlation-based, and intensity-based methods, as well as a custom, heuristic intensity-based method. We evaluate the performance of these methods using four metrics: RMSE, PSNR, SSIM, and NCC, averaged per scenario and across the entire dataset. The results show that conventional methods often fail to generalize across scenes, yielding <0.6 NCC on average, whereas the heuristic method shows that it is possible to achieve 0.77 SSIM and 0.82 NCC, highlighting the difficulty of cross-spectral UAV alignment and the need for further research to improve optimization in existing registration methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.