ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Measuring Statistical Dependence via Characteristic Function IPM.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unsupervised Feature Selection via Self-Supervised HSIC and Elastic Net Regularization.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We study statistical dependence in the frequency domain using the integral probability metric (IPM) framework. We propose the uniform Fourier dependence measure (UFDM) defined as the uniform norm of the difference between the joint and product-marginal characteristic functions. We provide a theoretical analysis, highlighting key properties, such as invariances, monotonicity in linear dimension reduction, and a concentration bound. For the estimation of the UFDM, we propose a gradient-based algorithm with singular value decomposition (SVD) warm-up and show that this warm-up is essential for stable performance. The empirical estimator of UFDM is differentiable, and it can be integrated into modern machine learning pipelines. In experiments with synthetic and real-world data, we compare UFDM with distance correlation (DCOR), Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC), and matrix-based Rényi's α-entropy functional (MEF) in permutation-based statistical independence testing and supervised feature extraction. Independence test experiments showed the effectiveness of UFDM at detecting some sparse geometric dependencies in a diverse set of patterns that span different linear and nonlinear interactions, including copulas and geometric structures. In feature extraction experiments across 16 OpenML datasets, we conducted 160 pairwise comparisons: UFDM statistically significantly outperformed other baselines in 20 cases and was outperformed in 13.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.