Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440446›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Mirror Descent and Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms Using Trace-Form Entropies.

Andrzej Cichocki, Toshihisa Tanaka, Frank Nielsen, Sergio Cruces

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrzej CichockiSystems Research Institute of Polish Academy of Science, Newelska 6, 01-447 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8364-7226
Toshihisa TanakaDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei-shi 184-8588, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5056-9508
Frank NielsenSony Computer Science Laboratories, Tokyo 141-0022, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5728-0726
Sergio CrucesDepartment of Signal Processing and Communications, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-7137

Funding

MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2021-123090NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces a broad class of Mirror Descent (MD) and Generalized Exponentiated Gradient (GEG) algorithms derived from trace-form entropies defined via deformed logarithms. Leveraging these generalized entropies yields MD and GEG algorithms with improved convergence behavior, robustness against vanishing and exploding gradients, and inherent adaptability to non-Euclidean geometries through mirror maps. We establish deep connections between these methods and Amari's natural gradient, revealing a unified geometric foundation for additive, multiplicative, and natural gradient updates. Focusing on the Tsallis, Kaniadakis, Sharma-Taneja-Mittal, and Kaniadakis-Lissia-Scarfone entropy families, we show that each entropy induces a distinct Riemannian metric on the parameter space, leading to GEG algorithms that preserve the natural statistical geometry. The tunable parameters of deformed logarithms enable adaptive geometric selection, providing enhanced robustness and convergence over classical Euclidean optimization. Overall, our framework unifies key first-order MD optimization methods under a single information-geometric perspective based on generalized Bregman divergences, where the choice of entropy determines the underlying metric and dual geometric structure.

Indexed as

Bregman divergencesdeformed logarithmsgeneralized exponentiated gradientinformation geometrymirror descentnatural gradient(q,κ)-algebraRiemnnian optimization

Identifiers

PMID41440446
PMCPMC12731593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.