Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440437›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Information-Processing Entropy and Heterogeneous Sentiment Reaction Windows: Evidence from S&P 500 Stocks.

Chi-Yao Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chi-Yao PengDepartment of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0006-9011-8329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the heterogeneous timing of market responses to financial news and its implications for informational uncertainty in price-adjustment dynamics. Empirically, stocks do not incorporate positive and negative sentiment at the same speed; instead, they exhibit asset-specific delays that stem from differences in investor attention, cognitive processing, and microstructural constraints. These unequal reaction windows increase the entropy of the information-transmission process, as sentiment shocks diffuse across assets in a dispersed and temporally misaligned manner. To quantify this heterogeneity, we develop a framework that integrates FinBERT-based sentiment classification, Bollinger Bands signal identification, and a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to estimate stock-specific sentiment reaction windows. Using S&P 500 data from 2021 to 2024, with 2022 to 2024 reserved for out-of-sample validation, the results show that GA-derived windows capture actual price-adjustment lags more accurately and significantly improve trading performance compared with fixed-window and technical-only benchmarks. In particular, incorporating news headline sentiment into the Bollinger Bands framework increases the win rate by approximately 5% over the testing period and leads to a significant improvement in overall returns. These findings demonstrate that the assimilation of sentiment is a time-dependent and non-uniform process shaped by behavioral and structural factors, offering new evidence that informational entropy-arising from delayed and heterogeneous reactions-plays a meaningful role in market efficiency and return dynamics.

Indexed as

Bollinger BandsFinBERTgenetic algorithminformational entropyinvestor behaviorsentiment analysistemporal heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID41440437
PMCPMC12732006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.