ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Extreme Events and Event Size Fluctuations in Resetting Random Walks on Networks.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Random walks with stochastic resetting, where walkers periodically return to a designated node, have emerged as an important framework for understanding transport processes in complex networks. While resetting is known to optimize search times, its effects on extreme events-defined as exceedances of walker flux above a critical threshold-remain largely unexplored. Such events model critical network phenomena, including traffic congestion, server overloads, and infrastructure failures. In this work, we systematically investigate how stochastic resetting influences both the probability and magnitude of extreme events in complex networks. Through analytical derivation of the stationary occupation probabilities and comprehensive numerical simulations, we demonstrate that resetting significantly reduces the occurrence of extreme events while concentrating event-size fluctuations. Our results reveal a universal suppression effect: increasing the resetting rate γ monotonically decreases extreme event probabilities across all nodes, with complete elimination at γ=1. Notably, this suppression is most pronounced for vulnerable low-degree nodes and nodes distant from the resetting node, which experience the largest reduction in both event probability and fluctuation magnitude. These findings provide theoretical foundations for using resetting as a control mechanism to mitigate extreme events in networked systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.