Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440405›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Transformer and Pre-Transformer Model-Based Sentiment Prediction with Various Embeddings: A Case Study on Amazon Reviews.

Ismail Duru, Ayşe Saliha Sunar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ismail DuruR&D Department, Türk Telekom, Ankara 06103, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4005-4818
Ayşe Saliha SunarDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-5616

Funding

Turk Telecom R&D No grant but the company supports open access publications.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is essential for understanding consumer opinions, yet selecting the optimal models and embedding methods remains challenging, especially when handling ambiguous expressions, slang, or mismatched sentiment-rating pairs. This study provides a comprehensive comparative evaluation of sentiment classification models across three paradigms: traditional machine learning, pre-transformer deep learning, and transformer-based models. Using the Amazon Magazine Subscriptions 2023 dataset, we evaluate a range of embedding techniques, including static embeddings (GloVe, FastText) and contextual transformer embeddings (BERT, DistilBERT, etc.). To capture predictive confidence and model uncertainty, we include categorical cross-entropy as a key evaluation metric alongside accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. In addition to detailed quantitative comparisons, we conduct a systematic qualitative analysis of misclassified samples to reveal model-specific patterns of uncertainty. Our findings show that FastText consistently outperforms GloVe in both traditional and LSTM-based models, particularly in recall, due to its subword-level semantic richness. Transformer-based models demonstrate superior contextual understanding and achieve the highest accuracy (92%) and lowest cross-entropy loss (0.25) with DistilBERT, indicating well-calibrated predictions. To validate the generalisability of our results, we replicated our experiments on the Amazon Gift Card Reviews dataset, where similar trends were observed. We also adopt a resource-aware approach by reducing the dataset size from 25 K to 20 K to reflect real-world hardware constraints. This study contributes to both sentiment analysis and sustainable AI by offering a scalable, entropy-aware evaluation framework that supports informed, context-sensitive model selection for practical applications.

Indexed as

categorical cross-entropycross-entropy losscustomer reviewsdeep learningembeddingsnatural language processingprediction modelspre-transformer sequence modellingsentimenttransformers

Identifiers

PMID41440405
PMCPMC12731383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.