Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440403›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Quantum AI in Speech Emotion Recognition.

Michael Norval, Zenghui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael NorvalDepartment of Electrical and Smart Systems Engineering, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6971-4990
Zenghui WangDepartment of Electrical and Smart Systems Engineering, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-336X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate a hybrid quantum-classical pipeline for speech emotion recognition (SER) on a custom Afrikaans corpus using MFCC-based spectral features with pitch and energy variants, explicitly comparing three quantum approaches-a variational quantum classifier (VQC), a quantum support vector machine (QSVM), and a Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA)-based classifier-against a CNN-LSTM (CLSTM) baseline. We detail the classical-to-quantum data encoding (angle embedding with bounded rotations and an explicit feature-to-qubit map) and report test accuracy, weighted precision, recall, and F1. Under ideal analytic simulation, the quantum models reach 41-43% test accuracy; under a realistic 1% NISQ noise model (100-1000 shots) this degrades to 34-40%, versus 73.9% for the CLSTM baseline. Despite the markedly lower empirical accuracy-expected in the NISQ era-we provide an end-to-end, noise-aware hybrid SER benchmark and discuss the asymptotic advantages of quantum subroutines (Chebyshev-based quantum singular value transformation, quantum walks, and block encoding) that become relevant only in the fault-tolerant regime.

Indexed as

AfrikaansMFCCnoise mitigationQAOAQSVMquantum machine learningspeech emotion recognitionvariational quantum classifier

Identifiers

PMID41440403
PMCPMC12731595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.