ReviewEpigenomes2025
The Evolutionary Misfit: Evolution, Epigenetics, and the Rise of Non-Communicable Diseases.
Review in Epigenomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Co-Evolution of Sleep and Diet: Toward an Emerging Framework of Evolutionary Chrononutrition in Circadian-Metabolic Health.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Effects of nutritional low phosphorus status caused by extremely low phosphorus diet during lactation and early childhood on endochondral ossification in offspring rats.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Human life expectancy has risen dramatically in the last century, but this demographic triumph has come at the cost of an explosion of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), threatening the sustainability of healthcare systems in aging, low-fertility societies. Evolutionary medicine provides a framework to understand, at least in part, this paradox. Many vulnerabilities to disease are not failures of design but the predictable outcomes of evolutionary trade-offs, constraints, and mismatches. Evolutionary mismatch theory explains how traits once advantageous in ancestral environments become maladaptive in modern contexts of abundance, sedentarism, and urbanization. The developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) concept describes how epigenetic plasticity in early life can buffer or amplify these mismatches, depending on whether adult environments align with developmental forecasts. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, even if still debated in humans, may further influence phenotypic plasticity, increasing or mitigating the mismatch. In evolutionary terms, the theories of mutation accumulation, antagonistic pleiotropy, and the disposable soma explain why longer lifespans, and ecological and social conditions profoundly different from those in which we developed, increase the likelihood that these costs are expressed clinically. Because most NCDs can be prevented and effectively controlled but not cured, efforts should prioritize quality of life for people, families, and communities. At the individual level, aligning lifestyles with evolved biology can mitigate risk, but the greatest leverage lies in population-level interventions. Urban health strategies represent a forward-looking attempt to realign modern environments with human biology. In this way, the concept of the evolutionary misfit becomes not just a diagnosis of maladaptation, but a guide for building healthier, more sustainable societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.