ReviewDentistry journal2025
Transforming Dental Care, Practice and Education with Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing: Innovations in Materials, Technologies, and Future Pathways.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Dentistry: Evolution, Technologies, and Clinical Application.Polymers · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, is revolutionizing modern dentistry, introducing high-precision, patient-specific, and digital-driven workflows across prosthodontics, orthodontics, implantology, and maxillofacial surgery. Extensive analysis explores the leading platforms in 3D printing such as stereolithography (SLA), fused deposition modeling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), digital light processing (DLP), and PolyJet which all achieve superior performance across multiple areas including resolution capabilities, material compatibility options, clinical application readiness, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, an extensive overview of common materials, including biocompatible polymers (PLA, PMMA, PEEK), metals (titanium, cobalt-chromium), and ceramics (zirconia, alumina, glass-ceramics), sheds light on the critical role of material selection for patient safety, durability, and functional performance. The review explores new advancements such as 4D printing with shape-adaptive smart biomaterials as well as artificial intelligence-enabled digital processes and prosthesis design for the transformation of regenerative dentistry and intraoral drug delivery operations into new domains and the automation of clinical planning. Equally groundbreaking are 3D printing applications in pediatric dentistry, surgical simulation, and dental education. However, full-scale adoption of AM technology is not without challenges, including material toxicity, regulatory hurdles for approval, high initial investments, and the need for extensive digital expertise training. Sustainability concerns are also being addressed, with recycled materials and circular economy models gaining traction. In conclusion, this article advocates for a future where dentistry is shaped by interdisciplinary collaboration, intelligent automation, and hyper-personalized biocompatible solutions, with 3D printing firmly established as the backbone of next-generation dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.