Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440230›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Should Fertility Preservation Be Offered to Young Women with Melanoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors? A SWOT Analysis.

Diego Raimondo, Michele Miscia, Antonio Raffone, Manuela Maletta, Linda Cipriani, Paola Valeria Marchese, Francesca Comito, Rossella Vicenti, Federica Cortese, Enrico Pazzaglia and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Diego RaimondoDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-4378
Michele MisciaDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5001-8271
Antonio RaffoneDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5443-2333
Manuela MalettaDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-7235
Linda CiprianiDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-5412
Paola Valeria MarcheseDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1309-2819
Francesca ComitoDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8591-0788
Rossella VicentiDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Federica CorteseDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Enrico PazzagliaDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-9046-3173
Linda BertoldoDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-5886-718X
Luigi CobellisDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Renato SeracchioliDivision of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7487-1333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped melanoma care, yielding durable remissions even in high-risk stages. As survival improves, fertility becomes a key survivorship concern for young women, yet the reproductive safety of ICIs remains insufficiently characterised. We performed a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis synthesizing preclinical and clinical evidence to evaluate the rationale for fertility preservation (FP) prior to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Preclinical models of PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade demonstrate ovarian immune activation, cytokine release (e.g., TNF-α), and follicular loss. Conversely, human data are limited to correlative analyses suggesting potential declines in ovarian reserve markers. In conclusion, while prospective studies are required to definitively quantify risk, proactive fertility preservation counselling should be routinely offered prior to treatment initiation to safeguard reproductive autonomy without compromising oncologic safety.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansOvarian ReserveOvaryRisk AssessmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadolescents and young adults (AYA)controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)fertility preservationimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapymelanomaoncofertilityovarian reserveovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC)pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41440230
PMCPMC12731626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.