ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Bladder Preservation in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis from British Columbia.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the 5th most common cancer in Canada and a quarter of diagnosed patients have muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Standard treatment options, systemic therapy and radical cystectomy (RC) are associated with high rates of adverse outcomes. Recently, trimodal treatment (TMT), a bladder preservation strategy defined as maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and chemoradiation, has been considered an alternative per guidelines for select patients who prefer bladder preservation or those with comorbidities. Nevertheless, the uptake of bladder preservation strategies in Canada remains low. We conducted a retrospective evaluation in British Columbia (BC) to assess the real-world outcomes of bladder-sparing radiotherapy. Cohort treated with combined chemoradiotherapy (concurrent and/or adjuvant, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) showed numerical improvements across all evaluated endpoints, including disease-specific survival and progression-free survival, compared with radiation therapy alone, which is generally considered an inferior strategy. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance, contrasting with the literature. Despite the limitations posed by the small sample size and the study's retrospective design, the findings highlight the pivotal role of appropriate patient selection in achieving meaningful therapeutic outcomes. Future studies integrating biomarker-driven strategies are needed to enhance outcomes through individualized treatment selection, particularly for older patients with multiple comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.