Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440202›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Socio-Demographic Inequalities in Diagnostic Delays of Breast Cancer: A Multistage Time-to-Diagnosis Analysis.

Oana Maria Burciu, Tudor Gramada, Smaranda Gramada-Stefurac, Raluca-Alina Plesca, Cristina Macuc, Andreea-Lucia Viforeanu, Ioan Sas, Aida Iancu, Adrian-Grigore Merce, Ionut Marcel Cobec and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oana Maria BurciuDoctoral School, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Tudor GramadaDoctoral School, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700483 Iasi, Romania.
Smaranda Gramada-StefuracDoctoral School, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700483 Iasi, Romania.
Raluca-Alina PlescaDepartment of Radiology, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iasi, Romania.
Cristina MacucDepartment of Radiology, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iasi, Romania.
Andreea-Lucia ViforeanuDepartment of Radiology, Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iasi, Romania.
Ioan SasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Aida IancuDepartment of Radiology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Adrian-Grigore MerceDepartment of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 300310 Timisoara, Romania.
Ionut Marcel CobecDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3240-4793
Gabriel Mihail DimofteDepartment of Surgery, Regional Institute of Oncology Iasi, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700483 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesIntroduction: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among women, and timely diagnosis is critical for improving outcomes. Organized screening programs strive to function efficiently, with minimal delays; however, evidence indicates that longer waiting times may be present at different stages of the diagnostic process. Few studies have evaluated how socio-demographic, reproductive, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics may influence diagnostic timeliness in a regional screening context. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 240 women who underwent breast biopsy following abnormal screening assessment, out of 24,000 patients enrolled in a regional breast cancer screening program conducted in Northeastern and Southeastern Romania. Diagnostic timeliness was observed across three consecutive intervals of the screening pathway: mammography to biopsy (T1), biopsy to histopathological confirmation (T2), and cumulative presentation-to-diagnosis time (T3). Baseline population characteristics were described, subgroup comparisons performed, and multivariable regression models applied to identify independent predictors of diagnostic delay and to explore interaction effects at different stages of the screening process.

resultsThe interval between mammography and biopsy accounted for the most substantial waiting times (T1 median 24 days). The cumulative time to diagnosis (T3) reached a median of 32 days. Territorial inequalities were the strongest determinant of delay: rural patients experienced approximately five additional days before histopathological confirmation compared with urban patients (

conclusionsIn our findings, regional background and social vulnerability outweighed individual risk factors in shaping total diagnostic time. These results support the careful monitoring of interval-specific performance to strengthen equitable access to biopsy among vulnerable populations, where the effectiveness of early breast cancer detection is often challenged.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelayed DiagnosisAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factorsbreast cancer screeningdiagnostic delaydiagnostic intervalsearly detectionhistopathological confirmationrural–urban inequalitiessocio-demographic factorstimelinessvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID41440202
PMCPMC12731797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.