ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025
Conceptualization of Digital Platforms Within Cancer Communication: A Review of Barriers and Drivers of Online Tools to Empower Children and Adolescents with Cancer to Understand Their Disease.
Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this research is to identify the most influential factors in the digital platforms used by cancer patients and their environments for accessing oncopaediatric information. This is a PRISMA-guided systematic review that synthesises studies published between 2004 and January 2023 and does not report new primary data. We explore the drivers and barriers of web-based platforms, health apps and social media. We conducted a literature review guided by the PICOS strategy: (P) children and adolescents; (I) factors affecting the use of health apps and social media; (C) without a specific comparison; (O) measuring impact, understanding and success factors; (S) using a conceptual approach. Our study reveals a dual dynamic in paediatric oncology science communication, in which drivers (information, collaborative efforts, comprehensive education) and barriers (age-appropriate content, misinformation) shape the complex communication landscape. The reality is that a healthcare application is needed that focuses on extensive education and the paediatric patient's involvement in understanding and improving their well-being. It requires adapting communication strategies. Additionally, we explore the theory of online health communication and identify several promising avenues for research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.