Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Stephanie AghamoosaDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-4884
Kelly RisheDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3676-9512
Julianne LauraDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4938-1612
Patricia FinettoDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2486-5365
Stephanie GarnerDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5229-471X
Lisa M McTeagueDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-9425
Deena Schwen BlackettSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7769-5870
Michelle L WoodburyDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9289-570X
Funding
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Functional Cognitive Rehabilitation as a Primer to Activity-Based Stroke Telerehabilitation: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Engagement. · full record | OpenQuestion