ReviewCells2025
Oncolytic Virotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanistic Insights, Enhancer Strategies, and Translational Combinations.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholecystectomy-associated gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes colorectal carcinogenesis: from epidemiological controversy to FXR-centered mechanistic insights.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and Emerging Strategies to Overcome Immunotherapy Resistance in Cold Tumours of Colorectal Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with most patients, especially those with microsatellite-stable disease, having limited treatment options. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality due to their ability to selectively replicate in malignant cells and mediate antitumor effects through direct oncolysis, immune activation, and modulation of tumor angiogenesis. This review analyzed 101 primary studies that reported the use of OV in CRC. The extracted data, including virus type, study design, model system, mechanistic pathways, and therapeutic strategies, were organized as standalone therapy, combination therapy, or enhancer-based approaches. Across studies, OV monotherapy consistently induced selective tumor cell lysis and, in some models, also exhibited additional immunogenic and anti-angiogenic effects. Combination strategies, particularly those with immune checkpoint inhibitors, demonstrated synergistic activity, enhancing T-cell infiltration, cytokine production, and tumor control even in resistant CRC settings. Enhancer approaches, including mesenchymal stem cell delivery systems and tumor-specific promoters, have improved viral selectivity, tumor penetration, and reduced immune clearance. Despite promising findings, progress is hindered by heterogeneous models and the scarcity of advanced clinical trials. Translation into well-designed clinical studies is now warranted to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.