Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41439953›Full record

SynthesisCells2025

Microfluidic-Based Scratch Assays for Wound Healing Studies: A Systematic Review.

Fernando A Oliveira, Nicole M E Valle, Keithy F da Silva, Arielly H Alves, Marta C S Galanciak, Gabriel M Rosário, Javier B Mamani, Mariana P Nucci, Lionel F Gamarra

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fernando A OliveiraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7226-1694
Nicole M E ValleHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4523-1753
Keithy F da SilvaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-8856-9654
Arielly H AlvesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-0827
Marta C S GalanciakHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-2924-4262
Gabriel M RosárioHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.
Javier B MamaniHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.
Mariana P NucciLIM44-Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1502-9215
Lionel F GamarraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3910-0047

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo , No. 2023/10843-7, 2025/12479-6, and No 2019/21070-3National Council for Scientific and Technological Development No. 307318/2023-0 and No. 102035/2024-5SisNANO 2.0/MCTIC No. 442539/2019-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration plays a central role in physiological processes such as wound healing, tissue regeneration, and immune responses, as well as in pathological conditions like chronic inflammation and tumor metastasis. Among the in vitro approaches to study this phenomenon, the conventional wound healing assay (scratch assay) has been widely used due to its simplicity and low cost. However, its limitations, including poor reproducibility, damage to the extracellular matrix (ECM), and lack of dynamic physiological conditions, have prompted the development of microfluidic alternatives. Scratch-on-a-chip platforms integrate engineering and microtechnology to provide standardized, non-destructive methods for wound generation, preserve ECM integrity, and allow precise control of the cellular microenvironment. These systems also enable miniaturization, reducing reagent and cell consumption, while facilitating the application of biochemical or physical stimuli and real-time monitoring. This review synthesizes advances reported in the literature, addressing the different wound induction strategies (enzymatic depletion, physical depletion, and physical exclusion), the role of ECM composition, and the impact of mechanical forces such as shear stress. Overall, scratch-on-a-chip assays emerge as promising tools that enhance reproducibility, better mimic in vivo conditions, and broaden applications for therapeutic testing and mechanistic studies in cell migration.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsWound HealingAnimalsCell MovementExtracellular MatrixHumansLab-On-A-Chip Devicescell migrationmicrofluidic devicescratch assayscratch-on-a-chipwound-healing

Identifiers

PMID41439953
PMCPMC12731330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.