SynthesisCells2025
Microfluidic-Based Scratch Assays for Wound Healing Studies: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Migration of Cardiac Cells: Hot Topics that have not Attracted Clinical Attention.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell migration plays a central role in physiological processes such as wound healing, tissue regeneration, and immune responses, as well as in pathological conditions like chronic inflammation and tumor metastasis. Among the in vitro approaches to study this phenomenon, the conventional wound healing assay (scratch assay) has been widely used due to its simplicity and low cost. However, its limitations, including poor reproducibility, damage to the extracellular matrix (ECM), and lack of dynamic physiological conditions, have prompted the development of microfluidic alternatives. Scratch-on-a-chip platforms integrate engineering and microtechnology to provide standardized, non-destructive methods for wound generation, preserve ECM integrity, and allow precise control of the cellular microenvironment. These systems also enable miniaturization, reducing reagent and cell consumption, while facilitating the application of biochemical or physical stimuli and real-time monitoring. This review synthesizes advances reported in the literature, addressing the different wound induction strategies (enzymatic depletion, physical depletion, and physical exclusion), the role of ECM composition, and the impact of mechanical forces such as shear stress. Overall, scratch-on-a-chip assays emerge as promising tools that enhance reproducibility, better mimic in vivo conditions, and broaden applications for therapeutic testing and mechanistic studies in cell migration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.